The International Computer Engineering Experience Program is an opportunity for Cal Poly and Princeton students to apply their technical knowledge in an international context and to increase global citizenship across campus.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Brent's Cultural Research Project
In Malta I plan to talk to Computer Science and Information Technology professors to get their view of the current state of the industry and what they believe might happen in the future. The final product for my project will be a piece of writing explaining the findings of my research.
Cultural Update - Engineering Degrees in Malta
Last week in our ES410 class, we gave final presentations that detailed our ethnic studies research papers and how we would be collecting data. Seeing as our ICEX team is splitting off from the rest of the class in one week, we will be completing our projects while in Malta! This gives our team some exciting benefits such as the ability to conduct on-site interviews and publish a primary source document.
My research project is on the difference between the engineering educations offered at Malta's two main tertiary educational facilities: University of Malta and Malta College of Art, Science and Technology (MCAST). The final product of my research will be in two segments. I will have a formal document, and online information that will go up on our website that will discuss the similarities and differences between the two schools. I intend to include information from interviews (WHEW! what an alliteration!) with professors from both universities discussing the degree to which the engineering work at each school could be considered "hands on" or "strictly theoretical". I would also like to include information about the reason for the formation of MCAST back in the 1970s. Both parts of my research project will come into a more clear context once we take off for Malta, so for right now I will wrap this up by saying that I am very excited to have this opportunity!
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Cultural Project Update
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Pool mapping test run


The next image is the SONAR map that was generated using Billy's software. After creating special files that contain information on the bearing, depth, and time that a SONAR reading was taken, a scan can be loaded in. Then we load in a second scan, and a particle filter is used to converge the two scans. This can be done with different SONAR scans until a complete map is generated. Since this was the first set of SONAR data that Tyler and I took, we did not have the gain up high enough to fill in all of the holes around the pool. This makes Jeff's hole filling algorithm work a bit harder to produce a final map a little further down the line.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Scientific Data Acquisition and Modeling Project Update 2


Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Ethnic Studies Module 1 Response: Styles of Communication
The Peace Corps Workbook, Culture Matters, includes a chapter discussing styles of communication. I found this chapter interesting, primarily because it focuses on a concept that I hadn’t previously considered. A style of communication is the manner in which one member of a group contributes his or her thoughts to another. While words that this person is saying guide the conversation during an everyday encounter, their style of communication is more focused on the directness, context, and subject that they choose to speak about. Style of communication varies wildly from culture to culture. The words spoken in a discussion in Denmark about taking the kids out to the park could be different from the words spoken in the United States, but both conversations would produce the same understanding between the two people in the discussion. Likewise, if two people do not share the same style of communication, they will walk away from a conversation with less information than what the other person intended. It is important to define and understand style of communication when discussing relations between two cultures.
Culture Matters breaks a culture’s style of communication into four categories. These are degree of directness, role of context, importance of face, and task vs. person. Degree of directness focuses on whether a person means what they are saying. If I am indirect, instead of telling someone that they are doing something wrong, I might ask them to try it another way. This avoids conflict, something that may be valued in one culture, or frowned upon in another. Role of context is how much preconceived information about the other person is brought to a conversation. In countries like Thailand, “people carry within them highly developed and refined notions of how most interactions will unfold” [1]. This is completely different from the United States, where people tend to be more individual, and therefore do not assume much about the other person. Importance of face is a culture’s emphasis on preserving politeness in a conversation. For example, a culture with low importance of face values facts and efficiency of words over the harmony of the exchange. Task vs. person is the degree of connection between business and personal matters in conversation. While it is acceptable to discuss the two together in the United States, people in other cultures might find it rather offensive to bring up family during a discussion about business.
Culture Matters emphasizes that individuals of a given background tend to share a similar style of communication with others from the same background. What is the extent to which this remains true? In personal experience, a stranger who has grown up in the same hometown as me can still identify with a completely different style of communication. I consider myself indirect and low context, but have met many people who are just the opposite. What degree of variance do individual cases introduce when binding a style of communication to a culture? Does this variance, in itself, vary with culture? Having lived in a close proximity to my home for my entire life, I am not yet able to answer these questions using generalizations about whole cultures. However, contemplating them prepares me for any future encounters with people that do not share my style of communication.
As an engineering student preparing to embark on a trip to another country with a completely different culture than the one that I am accustomed to, it is important to keep style of communication in mind. In The Globally Competent Engineer, Gary Lee Downy mentions that “engineering increasingly involves working alongside engineers from different backgrounds” [2]. In order to accurately invoke a technical, detail oriented idea into the mind of a person who does not share my background, I must bend my style of communication towards what he or she is more comfortable with. To do this, I must first identify the style of communication in the host country, which is the part that will take the most time and effort. While I am slightly afraid of offending a host or local to the country that I am visiting, I’m sure that if they have cognition of the fact that I do not share the same background as them, the offense will be dampened and we can laugh about it. Instead, I’m more interested in making my conversations with the locals meaningful. I would like to take away as much knowledge of another culture as I can. Altering my style of communication during conversation will add to my knowledge because the efficiency of the exchange will increase.
Style of communication is an inheritance to most, but can also be used as a tool to gain additional insight into the minds of others. It is a subcategory of a culture that is more or less present in every member. It takes an encounter between two cultures to become aware of it, and I hope that having knowledge of it serves to my benefit in my travels.
Works Cited
[1]"Styles of Communication." Culture Matters. Washington D.C.: Peace Corps Information Collection and Exchange. 75-108. Print.
[2] Downey, GL, JC Lucena, BM Moskal, T Bigley, C Hays, BK Jesiek, L Kelly, J Miller, S Ruff, JL Leer, and A Nichols-Belo, 2006. The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 95, No. 2, p. 107-122.
Monday, February 6, 2012
Malta Cultural Update:
May of the articles I have been reading about Maltese farming refer to the results of the 2010 census which estimated that 28.2 million cubic meters of water was used for farming between September 2009 and August 2010. However, I also found that, to date, Malta does not have an agricultural policy. Instead, farmers, like many other people and corporations, use private boreholes, or wells, to extract water from the small water table.
Water usage is a big deal on Malta, which is why a number of people are now calling for metering of all water extraction. One newly formed group called the "Malta Water Association" is calling for the immediate closure of all non-agricultural boreholes. They also want all agricultural boreholes to be metered by the end of this year. I think that this shows a practical attitude towards farming, because while the group wants to reduce water extraction, they also realize that farming relies on extracted water and cannot simply be cut off from that source. The group goes on to imply that the agricultural water meters are to be used to prevent gross over usage of water and are not to hinder typical farming needs. Again, I think that this is a good attitude to have towards water usage and farming.
Another big trend in Maltese agriculture is the Maltese Organic Agriculture Movement (MOAM). The farmers and institutions that support the organic movement suggest that organic farming will reduce damage to the environment, reduce water usage, and give Malta an economic edge. This argument seems very agreeable to the current Maltese outlook. Malta is very concerned about climate change, so doing things greener makes sense. Obviously the country has limited water resources, so water conservation is attractive to any Maltese person. The last point about an economic advantage refers to being able to markup organic crops over typical crops. It makes sense that Malta would want to produce more valuable crops because they have so little land for production. A larger country like Spain might be able to produce quantity, but Malta could try to corner the quality market.
I still have a lot of research to do, but farming on Malta is already turning out to be an interesting lens into current Maltese culture.